Clinical Reasoning: Where Do We Stand on Identifying and Remediating Difficulties?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Marie-Claude Audétat, Stuart Lubarsky, Jean-Guy Blais, Bernard Charlin Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada Medical Education and Continuing Professional Development Center (CPASS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada McGill Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Department of Administration and Education, Faculty of Education, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada Email: [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Models of clinical reasoning with a focus on general practice: a critical review
Introduction: Diagnosis lies at the heart of general practice.Every day general practitioners (GPs) visit patients with awide variety of complaints and concerns, with often minor butsometimes serious symptoms. General practice has many featureswhich differentiate it from specialty care setting, but during thelast four decades little attention was paid to clinical reasoningin general practice. T...
متن کاملAdhesive small bowel obstruction: where do we stand now?
Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is one of the most frequently encountered disorders in Emergency Surgery Departments worldwide without negligible hospital admission rates and social costs (1,2). Notwithstanding significant improvements in techniques and materials, intra-abdominal adhesions following abdominal surgery still represent a major unsolved and debated issue harbouring challeng...
متن کاملA novel model of clinical reasoning: Cognitive zipper model
Introduction: Clinical reasoning is a vital aspect of physiciancompetence. It has been the subject of academic research fordecades, and various models of clinical reasoning have beenproposed. The aim of the present study was to develop a theoreticalmodel of clinical reasoning.Methods: To conduct our study, we applied the process of theorysynthesis in accordan...
متن کاملThe Effect of Bayesian Reasoning Training on the Results of Clinical Reasoning Tests of Interns
Introduction: Clinical reasoning includes a range of thinking about clinical medicine at all stages of patient evaluation. Bayesian theory can be used to refute or confirm differential diagnoses in the clinical reasoning process. In this way, by learning the basic mathematical language of probability in medicine, we can change our beliefs according to new evidence. The aim of this study is to i...
متن کامل